Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1995-05-09 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1995-05-09 Senate Journal Page 1689 HB 233 CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 233(FIN) am "An Act extending the termination date of the Board of Clinical Social Work Examiners, Board of Marine Pilots, Board of Marital and Family Therapy, State Medical Board, Board of Nursing, Board of Psychologist and Psychological Associate Examiners, Real Estate Commission, Special Education Service Agency, Correctional Industries Commission, and Hazardous Substance Spill Technology Review Council; and providing for an effective date" was read the second time. Senator Halford moved and asked unanimous consent for the adoption of the Finance Senate Committee Substitute offered on page 1646. Senator Ellis objected. The question being: "Shall the Finance Senate Committee Substitute be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 233(FIN) am Second Reading Adopt Finance Senate Committee Substitute? YEAS: 11 NAYS: 8 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson Nays: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Pearce, Salo, Zharoff Excused: Donley and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 233(FIN) was adopted and read the second time. Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 1 : Page 2, line 17: Delete "December 31 [JUNE 30], 1994" Insert "June 30, 1995 [1994]" 1995-05-09 Senate Journal Page 1690 HB 233 Senator Lincoln moved and asked unanimous consent for the adoption of Amendment No. 1. Without objection, Amendment No. 1 was adopted. Senator Halford moved and asked unanimous consent that the bill be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Without objection, it was so ordered. SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 233(FIN) am S was read the third time. Senators Miller, Pearce offered the following Letter of Intent: Letter of Intent for SENATE CS for CS for HOUSE BILL No. 233(FIN) am S It is the intent of the legislature that the amendment of the termination date of the Board of Marine Pilots contained in CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 130(RLS), which is June 30, 1999, should supersede the amendment of the termination date of the Board of Marine Pilots contained in SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 233(FIN) am S, which is June 30, 1996. Therefore, if both bills pass the legislature, the legislature respectfully requests that the Governor sign the two bills in the order necessary to enact June 30, 1999 as the termination date of the Board of Marine Pilots. The legislature also affirms its intent that SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 233(FIN) am S be enacted, which contains amendments to the termination dates of Boards and Commissions other than the Board of Marine Pilots that are considered necessary by the Governor. Senator Miller moved and asked unanimous consent for the adoption of the Letter of Intent. Senator Duncan objected, then withdrew his objection. There being no further objections, the Senate Letter of Intent was adopted. 1995-05-09 Senate Journal Page 1691 HB 233 The question being: "Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 233(FIN) am S "An Act extending the termination date of the Board of Clinical Social Work Examiners, Board of Marine Pilots, Board of Marital and Family Therapy, State Medical Board, Board of Nursing, Board of Psychologist and Psychological Associate Examiners, Real Estate Commission, Special Education Service Agency, Correctional Industries Commission, and Hazardous Substance Spill Technology Review Council; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 233(FIN) am S Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Date YEAS: 19 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff Excused: Donley and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 233(FIN) am S passed the Senate. Senator Halford moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.